Re-Watching Hannibal 3/Red Dragon: Creepily Caring[Part 5]

/ January 30, 2019

Quick catch up with some pretty pictures before we go into boring words.

RA in Sundance, Photo: Aaron Richter

Yep, a couple more portraits from Sundance have surfaced. Ok, I am not mad about camel hair coats, but I am mad about gorgeous RA. Especially when laughing genuinely, as seen on the left. (There were a few more images, but frankly, I thought they were below par. I hear that some of you ladies count them as your favourites – I’ll leave it to you to post them, then ;-))

Right, and now  in medias res. First of all a little shout out to fellow blogger Herba: Seidenkimono!!!!! I love it when my fangirling goes organic – after discussing silk kimonos with Herba on her blog, I was delighted to find Francis clad in one such in this week’s episode 5 – 3×12 of Hannibal. And somehow, that kimono is a metaphor for the whole episode. There we have a beautiful silk, smooth garment – on a vicious, monstrous man. The kimono may well be straight from the book (I can’t remember – it’s a while since I read it, and I unfortunately deleted my ebook copy of Red Dragon.) but it is used here in Hannibal’s characteristically aestheticised way. The show frequently uses contrast to emphasise aspects of the plot/characters. So clad in the silky-smooth beautiful kimono, Francis Dolarhyde is at once caring – and threatening. He thoughtfully offers a blanket to his victim Dr Chilton, covering up his private parts, and warmly caressing his shoulders. And yet, he is about to mutilate, torture and nearly kill the man.

I still don’t know what it was that RA did when he played Francis Dolarhyde, that made the film crew gasp in shock. Is it the creepy stillness in this scene?

This is fascinating to watch. It is infused with dread and anticipation, true terror, and it is precisely the stillness and calm exuded by Francis – or RA – that makes this so threatening. There is only one little drawback for me – I just can’t get over the accent. The way RA says “burn” reminds me more of an Irish culchie farmer talking about the weekly rubbish disposal in the backyard. However, other details of the elocution are spot on – such as Francis suddenly having no trouble whatsoever pronuncing S-sounds. “Vicious, perverted, sexual failure” – he gets that across his lips without any trouble at all – just another sign that he is not Francis but the Great Dragon.

Let’s talk about the cinematography. While it is a great pity that most of Hannibal is too dark to see details, the cinematography in general is great. For the Red Dragon story arc, camera was by James Hawkinson. And I really appreciate what he did with perspective and framing. Take, for instance, the perspective in the screen shot above? How perfect does the view from below work here? It is very creepy, very scary, making the dragon look really big. Yet we still get to see all the terror on the victim’s face, too. Later on there is another scene where framing is handled beautifully:

What we get here is another fragmented view of Francis, and all we see is his cleft lip through the bevelled glass of his front door, over Reba’s shoulder. Brilliant idea – and organically done. Using items that are there in the production design, we get another aestheticised interpretation of a character. Artistic, original, exciting!

Gratuitous screen cap of Francis in kimono, with chestitage. UNF. This really shouldn’t arouse me the way it does…

In general, I found that in this episode I was less interested in the Chilton scenes – despite the lack of garments *coughs* – than in the few scenes with Reba. RA does insanity and anger so well – when he interrogates Chilton he is menacing and scary, with his voice noticeably different, although I found some of the hysteria possibly a little bit too much? But wow, I wouldn’t want Armitage to get angry at me, tbh. Whereas the tenderness with which Francis handles Reba – even though he has kidnapped her and is treating her roughly – is dreamboat-y.

Let’s draw the veil of silence over the disgusting violence of the episode. The only redeeming feature of that particular scene is the camera handling that precedes it.

And then there is… Armitage and nudity. Discuss. Or just enjoy?

Shout out to Kate *eyebrow wiggle*

And that is what I am leaving you with. I think the really interesting bits will come in the last instalment, tomorrow.

 

Related posts

44 thoughts on “Re-Watching Hannibal 3/Red Dragon: Creepily Caring[Part 5]”

  6. i’m writing down as i watch:
    so what made Francis buy pantyliners as a mask for Dr Chilton?
    i’m not sure the blanket is meant to be that comforting. Wonder why they chose to give Freddie Lowndes fate to Dr Chilton instead? (edit ah, they pretended to set fire to Freddie Lowndes) (later..ah, he does set fire to him, pretty gross that he gave him a flask of ice)
    i bet he hated tha Reba arrived ‘mid dragon’
    Bloody hell, he’s surprisingly terrifying
    now i’m oogling over those black boxers
    ok the biting thing was not scary-just bad sfx
    oh Reba is so good at holding it in-i loved Rutina Wesley when she was in True Blood and she’s just awesome as Reba

    so yeah, he’s definatley got a ton scarier this episode as he’s not really Francis anymore

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    • The panty liners are really rather a puzzle. Someone should ask Bryan Fuller or RA where that came from. I mean, not that FD had a woman living in the house with him. I am surprise he knew what they were and how to use them (i.e. peel the backing off)
      Yeah, the whole death by fire thing had to be reworked because they had already had an attack on Freddie earlier on in another season of Hanniba iirc.
      IDK, I really hated the biting thing and found it quite disgusting.
      Good point though – not Francis anymore.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  7. No time to watch now those episodes! I swear that I shall. But I send you back what I wrote 3,5 years ago, in Servetus blog (Richard Armitage, with deliberation: Thoughts on Hannibal 3.13 [spoilers?]) .
    Today, I am thinking the same way. I should add: Thank you Servetus to drive me back to what I wrote in 2015.
    squirrel.0072 said this on August 31, 2015 at 11:20 pm:
    “The worst for me is to realize, that by presenting this series with a crazy aestheticism, magnificent dialogues disentangled in the knife, brillantissimes actors, masterful scenes even by anthologies for some, Bryan Fuller glues me to his delirious cerebral world, to accept the concepts under ownerless, that he unscrupulously defends and without hiding too much. These concepts are presented under the cover of madness, of metamorphosis, of male friendship, of violence, of cannibalism, of symbols as the fire, the water, the blood, with a mixture of antique myths, religion, fantasy.
    How am I going to play in the future on Sundays innocently the Mahjongg with my family? Of course there are seasons, flowers, winds, bamboo, circles, characters, but what shall I make with a playing piece of red dragon in front of eyes or worse in hands? Am I going to reject it , either to keep it , worse to desire my game partners?”

    Like

    Reply

    • Oh yes, the red dragon symbol has taken on quite a meaning of its own…
      In retrospect, the show was quite something. I was quite critical of it as I was watching it. But now, several years later, I am looking back and thinking that beside the glamorisation of murder/cannibalism, there was actually a lot of art in the show. Not sure why I have mellowed on it. Maybe the shock value is simply gone, and that’s why.

      Like

      Reply

Let me know what you think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.