OTT?

So, with my Social Media hiatus looming, I am surreptitiously trying to generate more reasons for myself to blog and thus avoid cold turkey stay in touch and have reasons to be online and commenting/reading/distracting myself. Over the top? No, I was thinking of an OTT along the lines of a “Off-Topic Tuesday”. You see, recently I have felt the increasing urge to comment on some thing or other that is actually not related to RA. But this is an exclusive RA blog. Damn. Every once in a while I have sneaked in OT posts when it was really important such as political news, charity appeals,  or definitely less important stuff like my self-serving photo posts of Greece, Ireland and other places, as well as photography-related lectures pieces, and commemorative personal news, for instance. Heck, I even have a category tag called “OT”, so I figure I might as well go for it openly, rather than just sneak my OT commentary into Weekly Round-ups or RAPS introductions.

Chances are, that my OT(T) thoughts are triggered by something that has occurred or been discussed in the fandom, or is in some shape or form motivated by Mr A, anyway. Trust me, I can find a tenuous link to my most favouritest actor in almost anything, anyway… I’m pretty good at finding hidden connections. Here’s a classic example:

img_9895

This bottle has been lying in the laneway behind my house for the past week, and every time I walk past I think of Mr A. Sorry, Rich, for associating you with rubbish. Or alcohol. Dublin Porter. Hello, yesssss! I want a Dublin Porter *badly*. Make it a Dublin *John* Porter, please, who will magically replace that discarded bottle and cross my path the next time I amble down the lane. I’d pick up such a Dublin Porter, any time, and give him a good home.

⇠ ❤︎ ⇢

img_9890See what I mean? There’s a RA connection even in the most mundane of sights. Or sometimes, the connection is once removed – which is exactly what prompted today’s post. I was shopping at the weekend, and I dropped into one of my favourite Dublin places. It is called Powerscourt Townhouse, and is basically an indoor shopping mall, located in a historic townhouse. It once was the townhouse of the Viscounts of Powerscourt and consists of a magnificent mid-18th century Georgian house with back buildings arranged around a central (now covered) courtyard (see right, click to enlarge).

And now we are finally getting to the point. Powerscourt Townhouse is currently hosting a photo exhibition in conjunction with the Dublin International Film Festival, which is why I popped by. The photographer is none other than RA’s colleague from the eagerly awaited mediaeval road movie Pilgrimage, actor/director/photographer Hugh O’Conor. I very much liked his contribution to the 2016 Annual Show in the Royal Hibernian Academy (exhibit #7 in my list of sneaky OT commentary in regular postings) and was keen to see what he would produce by way of portraiture. Here’s his blurb:

img_9888

The inclusion of Andrew Scott of Sherlock fame on the promo material is no coincidence. Despite the grand words of the blurb, he is easily the most well-known of the subjects photographed by O’Conor. I recognised a few of the sitters – but many of them are of the “world-famous in Ireland” kind of fame. No matter, really, what counts is, how the imagery stands up of its own.

img_9889

The square format of the images already points to their origin on a medium format camera – (very) unusual in the age of full-frame (i.e. 35mm) digital photography. O’Conor shoots with a Hasselblad camera, a name that even most non-photographers recognise. A classy, high-quality camera, especially when paired with top-glassstaff-canteens-expo-2012 by Carl Zeiss. As such, the images originated on medium format film, therefore it is somewhat unusual to see the resulting prints are archival pigment prints (fancy name for “inkjet printed”) and not photographic prints. However, I can see where O’Conor was coming from with that decision: O’Conor chose to display the images – unprotected prints, unframed – simply hung from clip binders. Not an altogether new and revolutionary idea (even little me used that method way back in 2012 at an expo, see right, click to enlarge), but a good alternative when operating on a smaller budget. And with images not protected by glass, and people passing by the exhibit every day, some people probably pawing them, it does not make sense to invest heavily in photographic art prints. Mind, the archival prints are not chucked out on O’Conor’s desk printer, either, but professionally printed by fine art printers on fine art paper (incidentally the printing house whom I use, too. Good choice, O’Conor!).

img_9891

I had a good look at the images much to the boredom of daughter-dear who was accompanying me and it was clearly apparent that they are shot with much thought and deliberation. All b/w, they are all characterised by shallow depth of field with the focus on the subject and a soft, blurry background. This approach serves the intention of the exhibition estremely well: “featuring a selection of home-grown talent”, i.e. we are not only shown a face of an actor, but the image also anchors (most of) the sitters in a specific (noticeably Irish) location. As a local, I was able to make out details of the background, which enhances the idea that these are “local”, *Irish* artists.

The images are beautifully shot, carefully composed with the background never detracting from the most important element of the photos (the sitters). B/w is a great choice, as it emphasises the facial characteristics and avoids loud colour distractions. Despite the mostly symmetrical composition of the images with the sitter bang in the middle of the shots, there was a nice variety on show because every sitter was pictured in a different pose – which obviously means that O’Conor carefully directed his sitters and/or edited his images accordingly. All very aesthetic, arty and nice, technically convincing, and by no means bad.

However, there was a tinge of boredom in me when I was looking at the images. The images do not appear flat, in fact quite the opposite – the shallow dof creates a three-dimensionality that makes you want to reach out into the depth of the image. But what you are “touching” is not a living, breathing individual but a static sculpture. The sitters all appeared very still to me, frozen. Applying the benefit of the doubt and judging by the contemplative poses and looks off-camera by the sitter, I presume that that is exactly what the photographer wanted to achieve. I am deliberating whether it is a valid, good idea to show actors mannequin-like, a mere outer shell which they are providing for a character to inhabit. Personally, I find the “still” approach falls flat in a context where you are showing actors whose job is to imbue characters with *life*. But that interpretation is offered from the POV of someone who looks at acting *from the outside*. As an actor himself, O’Conor inevitably must have a different experience to the act of acting.

So, a mixed reaction from me to this piece of work. Looking at O’Conor’s website again, I was much more taken with another project of his that takes its subject(s) from the world of acting. Have a look at his photo project “Winter Pages” in which he explores what happens once the show is over. I found the resulting images beautiful, as well as touching and surprising. To me they exude a sense of exhaustion, possibly relief. O’Conor calls it “a weird netherworld” in the accompanying short text. To get back to my tenuous thematic connection to Mr A, the images immediately brought up memories of the TC SD and the impression that RA was often “not there”, still dazed, in another world – or another head, after 3.5 hours of being John Proctor. Grown-up Fan Heather touched upon that a little bit in this post, albeit in a different context. For non-actors such as ourselves, it is probably hard to imagine exactly what it must be like to finally sink down at the dressing table after “living” another person’s story for a few hours. O’Conor’s “Winter Pages” have certainly made me feel a bit more understanding of RA’s decision to occasionally skip the SD.

⇠ ❤︎ ⇢

If you have read this far – thanks for entertaining my photographic spleen, and for gracing an OT(T) post with your attention. I’d love to know what you think – do you have examples of every-day items and occurences reminding you suddenly of RA? Care to share?

 

 

27 thoughts on “OTT?

  1. Das wichtigste zuerst: Dein Blog, deine Regeln.
    Dein Blog läuft nach den ursprünglich von dir festgelegten Regeln inzwischen ein paar Jahre. Du hast dich verändert, deine Kontakte haben sich verändert, deine Leser haben sich verändert. – Wenn sich dein Blog auch verändert und die Regeln ein bisschen angepasst werden, dann ist das eine normale Entwicklung, kein Dir-selbst-untreu-Werden.
    Sehe ich jedenfalls so.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    *g* Ich schätze, jede/r kennt es, dass man Sachen sieht, die sofort eine Assoziation zu etwas oder jemandem hervorrufen, vor allem und besonders stakr dann, wenn der/die/das einem selbst emotional nahe ist. Der Auslöser kann eine Person, ein Duft, ein Ort, ein Erlebnis sein: *Trigger* im positiven Sinn.
    Es ist also kein Wunder, wenn dir die leere Flasche ein Schmunzeln entlockt. 😉
    Leider fällt mir jetzt kein Beispiel ein, aber ich bin sicher, dass ich solche Reaktionen auch schon in Bezug auf RA oder eine seiner Rollen hatte.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Was mir an der Ausstellung oben gefällt: Die sauberen schneeweiß-bis-tiefschwarzen Bilder auf der fleckigen alten Ziegelmauer. Sehr effektiv. 🙂

    Like

    • Danke Igelchen – das ist nett von dir, und du hast natürlich Recht. Die Hausregeln bestimme ich. Aber ich will natürlich auch meine Leserinnen unterhalten. Schließlich habe ich ja ein diesbezügliches Mission Statement (siehe ⤴ ). Und irgendwie wollte ich ja auch, dass das hier ein reines Sabberblog… eh, ich meine natürlich eine “thematisch auf das Oeuvre von Herrn Richard Armitage bezogenes Fachpublikation”… ist. Nur Richiebabyboo, nix anderes. Aber wie du schon schriebst – das Blog verändert sich mit seiner Blogette. Und nun gibt’s auch mal ein bisschen OT-Gesäusel. Praktisch: Mit OT in der Titelzeile kann man ungewolltes Lesen vermeiden.
      Höchst übel, diese Assoziationen mit RA, vor allem, wenn man sie nicht so-fort und stante pede mit jemandem teilen kann, der das ganze überhaupt *versteht*!!!! Gut, dass es wenigstens Kamerahandys gibt. Da kann man das ablichten und dann später noch mal verwursten.
      Lastly – ja, auf dieser Backsteinwand kamen die Fotos prima zur Geltung. Mir hat das auch außerordentlich gut gefallen. (Und wenn ich jetzt ein bisschen cleverer gewesen wäre, dann wäre ich da heute nachmittag noch mal hingepilgert (höhö, pilgern… Pilgrimage…) und hätte mich auf die Lauer gelegt, bis der Künstler höchstselbstens erscheint, um seine Werke von der Wand zu schrauben. Da hätte man doch mal eine Gelegenheit gehabt, ins Gespräch zu kommen und zu der Genese des fotografischen Werkes ein paar Fragen zu stellen. (Oder ein paar andere Fachfragen. “Und was machen Sie sonst so?” “Ich bin Schauspieler.” “Ach wiiiiiirklich? Was haben Sie denn zuletzt gedreht?” “Einen Mittelalterschinken.” “Oh, wie interessant. Noch andere bekannte Namen dabei? *unschuldiger Augenaufschlag* “… usw. )

      Like

  2. I have been to that shopping mall………a few years ago we spent our 25th wedding anniversary in Dublin……other things of interest were the Guinness museum/factory and a lively trip on a World War 2 amphibious vehicle which was painted bright yellow!

    Like

    • Ha – I’ve done either, too. I’m not a huge fan of the Guinness Storehouse (apart from the “Rooftop Bar” – best view across Dublin, plus a free glass of the brown stuff), but the Viking Splash Tours is absolutely great. Even as a resident of Dublin myself, I took it, years ago (when my kids were younger). Mind you, more often than that, I have been a “victim” of the tour, especially back in the day when I was still working in an office that was located along the route of the tour. They roared at me from the amphi-cle more than once…

      Like

  3. The Celebrating Irish Talent portraits seem to capture the way actors look when they’re in the in-between. That place where they’re working on something, but they’re in a state of rest in between scenework. The Winter Pages series, though .. . yes, that is definitely a lot of backstages I know during and after a show.

    Like

    • Interesting interpretation, Heather. That could well be for some of the pictures (e.g. the one of Andrew Scott – looks as if it’s taken in a dressing room, too), although most were clearly posed and taken in cafés and other public spaces (which you couldn’t know because I didn’t take pictures of those).
      Good to hear you confirm the netherworld scenario of the Winter Pages project! And glad to have you commenting here, because I was hoping for the opportunity to ask you – did you write about the post-show “slump” in your series? I looked through the posts but didn’t find anything. (But maybe I overlooked it.)

      Like

    • It’s really stunning. I took some pictures inside (my daughter commenting: “ugh, you make us look like tourists!”) even though I have photographed it so often already. Forgot to put them in the post…

      Like

  4. Pingback: Post-Show Slump: It’s a real thing. – Fully Grown-Up Fangirl

Let me know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s